ABSTRACT
Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is an extracorporeal circulation technique that provides circulatory and oxygenation support, and it is currently used in the treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS), pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrest (CA), and other diseases. However, this technology is still associated with high complications and mortality. The use of predictive scores for risk stratification before VA-ECMO will be helpful to screen the optimal benefiting population, make optimal clinical decisions, and allocate medical resources reasonably. At present, there are few reports about predictive scores for VA-ECMO. This article systematically reviewed the predictive performance of various scoring tools [the survival after venoarterial ECMO (SAVE) score, prediction of cardiogenic shock outcome for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients salvaged by VA-ECMO (ENCOURAGE) score, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD-Ⅺ) score, post-cardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (PC-ECMO) score, the predicting mortality in patients undergoing VA-ECMO after coronary artery bypass grafting (REMEMBER) score, predictors of mortality with VA-ECMO for acute massive pulmonary embolism, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) score, the hypothermia outcome prediction after extracorporeal life support (HOPE) score] for patients receiving VA-ECMO to provide reference for clinical treatment.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the predictive value of echocardiography hemodynamic parameters on 30-day survival rate after veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in refractory cardiogenic shock.Methods:A total of 44 patients with refractory cardiogenic shock who passed VA-ECMO weaning trial were retrospectively analyzed from September 2014 to February 2021. According to their 30-day survival outcomes after VA-ECMO removal, these patients were divided into the survival group (32 cases) and the death group (12 cases). Baseline data and the change rate of echocardiographic parameters between the first day of VA-ECMO and the day on VA-ECMO removal were compared, and the ultrasonic indicators affecting the survival of VA-ECMO within 30 days after withdrawal were determined.Results:The change rate of left ventricular ejection fraction(ΔLVEF%), the change rate of velocity time integral of the left ventricular outflow tract(ΔLVOT-VTI%), the change rate of ΔSa% and the change rate of right ventricular fractional area change(ΔRVFAC%) were improved significantly in the survival group ( P<0.05). The correlation coefficients between ΔLVEF% and ΔLVOT-VTI%, ΔLVEF% and ΔSa%, ΔLVEF % and ΔRVFAC% were 0.885, 0.861, 0.675, respectively( P<0.001); The correlation coefficient between ΔLVOT-VTI% and ΔSa was 0.918( P<0.001). ROC curve showed that the cut off values of ΔLVEF%, ΔLVOT-VTI%, ΔSa% and ΔRVFAC% to predict 30-day survival rate were 23.6%, 20.1%, 22.8% and 23.2% respectively, the sensitivity was 89.5%, 93%, 89.5% and 74.6% respectively, specificity was 66.7%, 66.7%, 66.8% and 75% respectively, the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.841, 0.867, 0.841 and 0.768, respectively. Conclusions:ΔLVEF%, ΔLVOT-VTI%, ΔSa% and ΔRVFAC% are predictive indicators of VA-ECMO withdrawl in patients with refractory cardiac shock. ΔLVOT-VTI% is the most valuable indicator of predicting 30-day survival rate after VA-ECMO withdrawl. Patients who meet two or more VA-ECMO echocardiographic indicators are more likely to succeed in VA-ECMO withdrawl. The improvement of right ventricular systolic function is a prerequisite for survival after 30 days of VA-ECMO withdrawal, while LVEF is an important criterion for survival after 30 days of VA-ECMO withdrawal.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyze the early volume characteristics of patients with severe cardiogenic shock treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and the relationship between their early volume and the prognosis.Methods:This study reviewed patients of Emergency Medical University , treated with VA-ECMO and screened the patients with severe cardiogenic shock and VA-ECMO running more than 72 h for further study. The basic condition of the patients was recorded, and the fluid balance in the first 72 h was analyzed. The patients were grouped according to their fluid balance in the first 72 h. The gender, age, survival rate, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) rate, intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) rate, and invasive mechanical ventilation rate were compared between the two groups, and the relative risk to the prognosis was calculated. The prognosis was compared between the two groups. Results:Totally 77 patients with severe cardiogenic shock were enrolled. Forty-one cases survived, with an overall survival rate of 53.2%. The volume balance at 48-72 h and the total volume balance at the first 72 h were different between the survival and dead groups. Compared with the positive balance group, patients in the negative balance group were less likely to receive CRRT or invasive mechanical ventilation during the first 72 h. Patients in the negative balance group during the first 72 h had a better survival rate, and their relative risk of survival was 1.81 (95% confidence interval: 1.101, 2.985). However, there was no significant difference in survival rate according to every 24 h fluid balance.Conclusions:Patients with severe cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO who had negative total volume balance during the first 72 h are more likely to survive and less likely to require CRRT or invasive mechanical ventilation.
ABSTRACT
@#Although extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been in existence since the 1970s as a means of supporting respiratory or cardiac function, early application of this technology was plagued by high complication rates. Peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) causes higher left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, pulmonary edema, left ventricular distention, ventricular arrhythmia, low coronary perfusion, myocardial ischemia, substantial thrombus formation within left ventricule cavity and even multiple organ dysfunction. Mechanical left ventricular decompression is required to treat these related complications. In this article, we reviewed the problems associated with left ventricular decompression supported by peripheral V-A ECMO in patients with cardiogenic shock.
ABSTRACT
The utilization of temporary circulatory support in the form of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has increased and its indications are expanding. Anesthesiologists may be involved in the care of these patients during the initiation of and weaning off from ECMO, surgical procedures with an ECMO in situ, and transfer of patients on ECMO between the operating theater and intensive care unit. This article addresses the anesthetic considerations and management for explant of veno-arterial ECMO in adults.
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the feasibility of early enteral nutrition (EEN) in adult patients during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and its related clinical results. Methods Thirty-four patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Ningbo Medical Center Li Huili Hospital from January 2012 to December 2017 to receive VA-ECMO treatment were selected as the study objects. All patients received EEN after exclusion of contraindications; the target calories were calculated by using 104.65 kJ·kg-1·d-1(25 kcal·kg-1·d-1) and according to 1.2 g·kg-1·d-1, the target protein requirements were calculated. Within one week of EN energetic treatment, if the feeding amount reached 80% or over of the above calculated targets, the EN administration was fulfilling the standard, thus the patients were divided into a standard group and a non-standard group, After ICU admission, the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ) score, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) score, the time from the beginning of ECMO to the start of EN, time reaching feeding standard, VA-ECMO persistent days, ICU days of stay, total hospitalization days, hospital mortality, and reasons for feeding interruptions were recorded, and the effects of EEN on prognosis of patients during VA-ECMO were analyzed in the two groups. Results The APACHE Ⅱ score and MODS score of the non-standard group were higher than those of the standard group on admission of ICU (APACHE Ⅱscore: 25.50±5.62 vs. 19.91±8.53, MODS score: 11.08±3.26 vs. 6.73±2.05, both P < 0.05), and the hospital mortality was lower in the standard group than that in non-standard group [40.9% (9/22) vs. 83.3% (10/12), P < 0.05]. The comparisons of differences in time from the beginning of ECMO to the start of EN, time of reaching feeding standard, VA-ECMO treatment days, ICU days of stay, hospitalization days between the two groups were of no statistical significance (all P > 0.05). The most common reason for interruption of feeding was high gastric residual volume (GRV). Conclusion Whether a critically ill patient receiving VA-ECMO can reach the target feeding amount in a week or not is related to the degree of disease severity; it is difficult for a seriously ill patient to reach the target amount of feeding, that may affect their prognosis.